October 2, 2024 - Basin and Range Watch, along with other groups, have commented all long the way during the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) review, and we filed our Protest on October 1. The Bureau of Land Management failed to address many of our concerns, such as failing to analyze our nominated Areas of Critical Environmental Concern, failing to exclude crucial Mojave desert tortoise connectivity corridors from solar development, grandfathering in earlier solar applications on high-value public lands, and pushing a large amount of solar development areas into the sagebrush habitats which will impact sage grouse, pygmy rabbits, pronghorn antelope, and the socioeconomics of rural communities.
Read all our comments uploaded into our public library of PDFs:
Protest:
Protest on the Old Spanish National Historic Trail with Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility:
Comments on the Draft Solar PEIS:
Scoping comments:
August 30, 2024 - Nevada is the bullseye for solar development in the Proposed Action in the Final Solar Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) released by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) -- see the BLM eplanning page. Instead of allowing the public to draw maps of significant resources in public lands in order to proytect them, such as was undertaken in the California Desert area in the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) which was approved in 2016, Nevada and other western states have a streamlined and unduely quick process of the federal agency deciding where utility-scale solar energy development should go.
As we analyze the large number of documents in the Final Solar PEIS, we summarize the good, the bad, and the ugly of the energy land rush on public lands.
The Federal Register notice today announced BLM's plans to open ip millions of acres of wildlands and intact ecosystems and recreation lands in the Western U.S to energy development: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended (FLPMA), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Proposed Resource Management Plan (RMP) Amendments for Utility-scale Solar Energy Development and by this notice is announcing the start of a 30-day protest period. (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2024/08/30/2024-19478/notice-of-availability-of-the-final-programmatic-environmental-impact-statement-for-utility-scale)
The Good: most modeled Mojave desert tortoise habitat (outside of and including critical habitat) and some modeled greater sage grouse and Gunnison’s sage grouse habitat are solar exclusion areas. Basin & Range Watch pushed for this.
The sage grouse map looks like a partial placeholder for an Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) nomination by conservation groups in 2023 (see below). Solar exclusion areas include some sage grouse Priority Habitat Management Areas, but Wyoming seems to be largely left out for exclusion. The BLM may be preserving some of these habitats for an ACEC designation when Resource Management Plans are revised in the future. Basin & Range Watch pushed for sage grouse protection.
Ranges of several other federally Threatened and Endangered species such as the Dixie Valley toad in Nevada, and a list of rare plants, are excluded from solar energy development. This is good.
Big game migration corridors are to be solar exclusion areas following Resource Management Plans, and state agency input. Not all of these are mapped. Basin & Range Watch pushed for protecting all big game migratory corridors.
Lands with Wilderness Characteristics are excluded, although BLM's map leaves out many of these areas. Visual Resource Classes I and II are excluded, but this is not surprising (areas we think are beautiful, but that BLM has classified as so ugly that they can be industrialized). Tribal Interest Areas in New Mexicio are excluded-good.
National Scenic Trails, including any associated corridor, are excluded.
Species Conservation Agreements/Strategies are excluded--all areas where BLM has agreements with US Fish and Wildlife Service and/or state and other agency partners to manage senstive species habitat "in a manner that would preclude large-scale impacts/disturbance, such as solar energy development."
Specific areas in states are also excluded from new solar development, such as Ivanpah Valley.
The Bad: the definition of “disturbed lands” is not scientifically viable. They are labeling cheatgrass areas which are currently in this sanpshot of time in an early seral state, wildfire burn scars, and livestock grazing disturbances as solar development areas. This denies ecological succession and that these areas can gradually recover and restore if the disturbance is lessened or removed. Invasive weeds may dominate in one drought year, then fade away and native bunchgrasses dominate the next year during favorable rains. We have seen it. Tribal management of landscapes also seems to be ignored and overlooked when deciding on these "human settlement" dates and vegetation departure measures. The discussion of the defintion of "disturbed lands" is highly problematic.
The Ugly: the Proposed Plan says: Lands available are those within 15 miles of existing and planned transmission lines with a capacity of 69 kV or greater or within 15 miles of an existing designated energy corridor, unless otherwise excluded by resource-based criteria. This opens up huge new areas across remote wild public lands, where proposed transmission lines such as Greenlink West deviate from following existing highways, and cross basins and mountains.
Will the new “solar energy zones” (developments allowed areas) be wide swaths along the proposed Greenlink West and North Transmission Projects, developing huge areas below 10% slope in wild parts of Nevada, some of which are remote and away from highways? The Esmeralda County, Nevada, Tomopah areas, Amargosa Valley, South Pahrump valley, and many basins in northern nevada are thrown under the bus for solar development, despiote being wild, intact landscapes, biodiverse ecosystems, rural economic activities.
Some solar applications are grandfathered in and some are not? We are digging into this.
We will protest this plan.
Map from the Final Solar PEIS. This is remarkably good, although we disagree with leaving some areas out for grandfathered-in solar applications such as in the South pahrump Valley, NV, and Amargosa Valley, NV. It's interesting the map color scheme BLM chose, with pink and red for solar exclusion areas (conserving precious biodiverse habitat), and green for solar development areas (which would destroy the green vegetation that wildlife relies on.)
Below is a modeled map of Mojave desert tortoise habitat which you can compare with BLM's solar exclusion areas for Nevada, Utah, and Arizona: Nussear, K.E., Esque, T.C., Inman, R.D., Gass, Leila, Thomas, K.A., Wallace, C.S.A., Blainey, J.B., Miller, D.M., and Webb, R.H., 2009, Modeling habitat of the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) in the Mojave and parts of the Sonoran Deserts of California, Nevada, Utah, and Arizona: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009-1102, 18 p.
California is excluded from the 2024 Solar PEIS review since the DRECP Record of Decision of 2016 covered solar deveopment areas and conservation areas. Why is Nevada not allowed the same detailed review?
We have to give BLM some credit here for trying to exclude some modeled Greater sage grouse and Gunnison sage grouse habitat across the West as solar exclusion areas. this exclusion area appears to follow Priority Management Habitat Areas (PHMAs) for greater sagregouse, but with modifications. But a lot can be told with differing maps.
See the map below of BLM PHMAs (from Remington, T.E., Welty, J.L., Aldridge, C.L., Jakes, A.F., Pilliod, D.S., Rachlow, J.L., Smith, I.T., 2021. Chapter Q. Sage-grouse management as an umbrella for conservation of sagebrush. In: Remington, T.E., Deibert, P.A., Hanser, S.E., Davis, D. M., Robb, L.A., Welty, J.L. (Eds.), Sagebrush Conservation Strategy—Challenges to Sagebrush Conservation: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2020-1125, pp. 193–202.)
BLM in the Final Solar PEIS appears to have added some solar exclusion areas but erased other good sage grouse habitat such as in Wyoming. Note that the historic habitat of sage grouse was much larger, including sagebrush habitats in mountains and basins in a much broader area across the West.
Compare this ACEC nomination map by conservation groups, above, with the BLM's Proposed Project map in pink of sage grouse exclusion areas in the Final Solar PEIS. There is some overlasp, but the match is not exact, especially in Wyoming. (American Bird Conservancy, Center for Biological Diversity, Western Watersheds Project and WildEarth Guardians. 2023. Nomination for a Sagebrush Sea Reserve Areas of Critical Environmental Concern [ACEC] Network, included in a comment to Bureau of Land Management. Dated June I, 2023.)
Alkali sacaton (Sporobolus airoides) meadows in a basin with Lone Mountain in the background, Esmeralda County, Nevada, west of Tonopah. This is in southern Big Smoky Valley, proposed to be open to large-scale solar energy development.
Pancake Range, Nevada ❤️. Will these remote, beautiful, biodiverse wildands with slope of 10% or below be opened up to utility-scale solar energy development to serve data centers in distant urban areas? The 2024 Solar PEIS says yes. This scenic landscape is not too far from the proposed Greenlink North Transmission Project which we do not need. We say no. Solar panels need to go first on rooftops and ver parking lots in the built environment!
Check out these links to articles, blog posts and email alerts on the release of the Final Solar PEIS:
Chris Clarke's excellent Letters From the Desert on Substack (please donate to support Chris's amazing reporting on our beloved deserts): https://open.substack.com/pub/lettersfromthedesert/p/letter-from-the-desert-western-solar?r=8pc5d&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Center for Biological Diversity press release: https://biologicaldiversity.org/w/news/press-releases/federal-plan-for-public-lands-solar-development-opens-33-million-acres-in-11-western-states-2024-08-29/
Water at center of objections to Nevada solar farms as 30-day protest period opens:
Good article from the Los Angeles Times:
Thank you to The Nevada Indepenedent for interviewing Basin & Range Watch and reporting on this important topic: https://thenevadaindependent.com/article/finalized-federal-plan-outlines-future-of-nevada-western-solar-development (please donate to support reporting on Nevada issues).
April 18, 2024 - Basin & Range Watch along with a few other conservation groups submitted extensive comments on the Bureau of Land Management's Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) and Resource Management Plan Amendment which will update the Western Solar Plan. We support conserving all Mojave desert tortoise known occuppied habitat, all migration corridors for big game, all rare plant areas, and much more in extensive solar exclusion areas. Read more below. See our comment here:
The solar industry along with several national environmental groups also submitted comments, and these ask the Bureau of Land management (BLM) for more ways to allow solar development and less restrictions. We include these public comments here:
Slides from BLM public meetings on the Solar PEIS 2024.
The Preferred Alternative (3) would allow at a minimum 700,000 acres of lands to be developed for utility-scale solar projects. This is a huge area of public lands. Any update to the Plan should take a landscape-scale approach to planning. This includes ensuring that lands for conservation and recreation are identified before new areas for renewable energy development, and that any
development is balanced with additional conservation, with an open and transparent public and stakeholder process. Huge areas of high-quality habitat for sensitive species, federally Threatened species, and other wildlife and rare plants has already been developed for utility-scale solar projects on public lands across the Western US, especially in California, Nevada, and Arizona deserts and grasslands. This energy build-out must now be balanced with conservation of intact landscapes, healthy native plant communities, and thriving habitats.
We do not support any of the Alternatives presented in the PEIS. Even Alternative 5 has too much intact high-quality habitat for imperiled species. All Nevada Alternatives are based on existing or future transmission plans. They are "excluding" areas 10 miles away from transmission on Alternative 3 but BLM is assuming the
Greenlink Transmission Projects and Gridliance upgrades are already approved – this is predecisional. BLM should analyze a Conservation Alternative which values public land natural and cultural
resources very highly and gives incentives to solar developers to build on brownfields, degraded lands, old mine sites, superfund sites on public lands. With substantial incentives, such a conservation
alternative could significantly reduce harmful impacts to natural and cultural resources. A prioritization process should give highest priority to truly disturbed lands (and not Mojave Desert scrub, Sonoran Desert arid habitats, saltbush scrub, sagebrush scrub, or grasslands. The Need for solar energy on public lands wildlife habitats and intact ecosystems would be much reduced if Distributed Generation in the existing built environment—rooftops and parking lot canopies—was maximized. It’s time for BLM to balance rampant renewable energy development on public lands habitats with conservation of wildlands, wildlife and natural ecosystems. BLM should incentivize solar developers to avoid sensitive habitats, wildlife connectivity corridors, and all occupied habitats for Threatened and Endangered species, as well as avoid many other important areas of public lands as we detail below.
Camera trap photo of desert kit fox vixen and pup on a solar project under construction in the West Mojave Desert of California, 2023. This natal den originally had (6) pups that were monitored during pupping season. Once the pups were approximately 8 weeks old the den pups split into groups of (3) and dispersed to two separate dens on site. The wildlife biological monitor kept data on the progress of the dens. Once pupping season was over the wildlife biologist used passive relocation hazing techniques to disperse the adolescent kit fox from the work site. Some of this group of kitfoxes will likely return to the exact same burrow site later in the year or next season to re-dig and possibly raise next year’s pups. Excavation of a den site does NOT prevent repatriation of a site by kit foxes. They have loyalty to a den site no matter whether it is excavated or backfilled.
The desert kit fox (Vulpes macrotis arsipus) is a BLM Sensitive Species in certain states.
Currently on some solar projects under construction, desert kit fox clans live in solar projects under construction, and are monitored by a wildlife biological monitor. There is not a set protocol from California Department of Fish and Wildlife but there are approved methods for passive relocation and evicting kit foxes from solar project construction sites that are being tested.
Kit fox families may be allowed to den in spring inside zones of the solar fields under construction during their 1st year as pups, and allowed to disperse in the fall. Their pupping den will then be excavated forcing them to find an alternate burrow outside the fence line to make a new den. Fence lines are usually more than a square mile and patch-worked in the landscape causing dislocation even outside of all the fence lines. It becomes more and more difficult for kit foxes to navigate the landscape. Many solar projects are now 10-12 square miles in size, the size of some towns and cities.
Kit foxes tend to have multiple dens spread over an area of two square miles or more. Large solar installations are usually much larger (to 10 square miles or more) and can very well encompass entire kit fox territories, including most or all kit fox family dens. This could push kit fox territories into each other’s hunting territories, and could result in competition for food and shelter. This could also put them at risk of predation, such as from coyotes, as they search for new resources. BLM needs to analyze these impacts and not ignore solar project impacts to desert kit foxes.
Kit foxes across the Western states will need to be evicted out of their burrows and home territories to make more room for solar projects--and those photovoltaic panels could just as easily go onto rooftops and over parking lots in load centers.